A Motion for Summary Judgment can be filed when one side of a lawsuit considers that there are enough facts and evidence to avoid a full trial, which means if the Judge grants the motion, he or she will issue a ruling on all or part of the lawsuit in accordance with state or federal law.
The Motion for Summary Judgment can, quite simply, be defined as a request for a judge to decide a case based on the evidence provided to the judge. Either a plaintiff or defendant can bring the Judgment.
The judge will then decide whether or not to grant the motion based on the circumstances and evidence of the case. Either party can then rebut the motion by providing their own evidence and arguments in support of their position.
In this article, you’ll find out what a Motion for Summary Judgment is, when you should use it, and who could potentially benefit from it.
Motion For Summary Judgment: What Is It?
At times, it is beneficial to file a motion for summary judgment so that the judge will promptly issue a judgment, in favor of the person who filed the motion, on a case’s entirety or on specific issues within the case. This can sometimes help to avoid a lengthy and expensive legal process.
In deciding whether to grant a Judgment, the judge will examine the plaintiff’s and defendant’s arguments and evidence, plus the legal standard for granting the motion, which varies by jurisdiction.
A party requesting Summary Judgment must demonstrate that there are no issues involving a dispute of facts in most jurisdictions. A party may contest the motion if they disagree with the issues at hand or believe that there is insufficient evidence to support a Summary Judgment.
Who Can File A Motion For Summary Judgment
A Motion for Summary Judgment can be filed by either the plaintiff or defendant.
Most of the time, the plaintiff files a Motion for Summary Judgment, providing evidence sufficient for the judge to support a ruling. Of course, the defendant’s legal team may submit evidence to counter the plaintiff’s claim.
Defendants may also file a Motion for Summary Judgment if they believe that there is sufficient evidence in their favor to dismiss the claims.
No matter which party files, the judge determines its outcome.
Motion For Summary Judgment: Why Is It Used?
When a judge grants a motion for summary judgment, the case is resolved efficiently without having to spend additional time in court.
An initial court date is not considered by a judge when granting a Motion for Summary Judgment. Only evidence and facts presented before that date are considered by the judge.
As a result of the pretrial evidence, the defendant’s response, and other documentation, the judge will decide whether the motion is reasonable. If insufficient evidence exists to grant a summary judgment motion, the judge will order a trial.
How Will The Judge Rule On A Motion For Summary Judgment
It’s up to the judge whether the plaintiff and defendant agree on the issues concerning the Motion for Summary Judgment since he or she has ultimate authority in the decision. The judge’s likely going to grant the motion if both sides don’t dispute the facts and existing case law supports it.
The judge can deny the Motion for Summary Judgment if either side disputes it. If there are questions about the evidence or insufficient facts to support the claim, the case is likely to go to trial. The judge will also carefully consider whether there’s enough evidence to support a Summary Judgment finding.
The Burden Of Proof Rests On The Party Filing The Motion For Summary Judgment
In summary judgment cases, the party who requests the Motion for Summary Judgment is responsible for the burden of proof. It does not matter whether it is the plaintiff or defendant who requests the Motion for Summary Judgment; the party who requests the Motion for Summary Judgment must provide the evidence.
A party will provide evidence and argument to support their claims once they submit a Motion for Summary Judgment. If the other party wishes to rebut the motion, they must provide sufficient evidence for the judge to conclude that there is a dispute of facts that requires a trial.
Does It Benefit The Plaintiff Or Defendant?
In a lawsuit, a Motion for Summary may benefit either party.
See If You Qualify for Credit Card Relief
See how much you can save every month — plus get an estimate of time savings and total savings — with your very own personalized plan.
The Motion for Summary Judgment offers the plaintiff the opportunity to avoid an expensive, lengthy trial against a defendant. If the plaintiff has enough evidence to prove the case to be legal, it is also advantageous to avoid clogging the court system with unnecessary litigation.
If a defendant believes they have sufficient information to dismiss the case, they may file a Motion for Summary Judgment. They can severely damage the plaintiff’s claims if, for example, they have sufficient documentation to persuade the judge that one of the elements of the case is incorrect.
Both sides of a lawsuit will consider whether a Motion for Summary Judgment is appropriate for their claims.
How To File A Motion For Summary Judgment
While a Motion for Summary Judgment is pending, it is not uncommon for attorneys to seek a settlement. According to the circumstances and the evidence presented, a settlement may be advantageous.
To avoid an extensive trial, a defendant may, for example, offer a settlement offer when he believes there is a high probability that the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment will be approved. Even though the settlement offer may not provide everything the plaintiff seeks, it will reduce costs and limit the attorney’s fees.
It is important to note that not all attorneys will attempt to settle. If the judge is unlikely to grant a Motion for Summary Judgment, they may allow the lawsuit to proceed.
In Debt Cases, A Motion For Summary Judgment Is Not That Common
In a debt case, a Motion for Summary Judgment is not common. Generally, they are more common in criminal proceedings, though they may be appropriate in civil proceedings as well.
There is a greater likelihood for defendants in debt lawsuits to face a Motion for Default Judgment, which can be filed by the creditor when the defendant fails to respond to the Complaint or fails to appear in court.
If a consumer files an Answer in response to a creditor’s Complaint, a creditor may request a Motion for Summary Judgment. The judge will determine whether to file a Motion for Summary Judgment if the consumer’s Answer does not provide sufficient supporting evidence to refute the creditor’s Complaint.
Consumers will have the opportunity to rebut the creditor’s Motion for Summary Judgment. If they do, a judge will consider both sides before deciding whether to grant the Judgment or to allow the case to proceed to trial or hearing.
Difference Between A Motion For Summary Judgment And A Motion For Default Judgment
A Motion for Summary Judgment is appropriate when either party believes there are sufficient facts and evidence to support their claims in a lawsuit. Consider a hypothetical scenario where a plaintiff files a Complaint and a defendant responds to the complaint. The parties prepare themselves to represent themselves in court.
Despite this, one party feels that they have a strong case that meets the requirements of federal or state law. As an example, a prosecutor who files a lawsuit against a defendant for theft may present a video recording, statements from witnesses who witnessed the robbery, and photographs of the defendant leaving the crime scene as evidence. In what appears to be a clear-cut case, the prosecutor may request a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the evidence presented.
There are two possible outcomes for the defendant. They can either accept the plaintiff’s allegations against them or attempt to refute them by presenting additional evidence or arguments. For example, the defendant may claim that the video provided by the plaintiff was not their own.
The judge will review both the plaintiff’s evidence and the defendant’s arguments before issuing a ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment. If the judge believes the evidence is insufficient, the case will go to trial.
In debt collection cases, a Motion for Default Judgment is typically filed when the defendant does not respond to the plaintiff’s initial complaint within the required deadline.
In another example, Payday Loans 4 U files a complaint against a consumer, Susie, who failed to repay their loan. Susie ignores the complaint and the lawsuit, failing to defend herself at all.
During Susie’s court date, Payday Loans 4 U requests a Default Judgment. Since Susie has not responded to the case, the judge grants the request, and Payday Loans 4 U obtains the judgment from the court that they can use to collect the funds from Susie.